 |
| Will the
Illinois GOP go the way of the T-Rex? Ralf Seiffe examines... |
SEIFFE: Paleonalysis of
the IL GOP
Monday, February 14, 2005
By Ralf Seiffe
OPINION - One of life’s
enduring questions is what happened to the dinosaurs?
It is one of those permanent mysteries
because no one was there to determine whether some crashing meteorite, a
cataclysmic seismic event or even aliens changed environmental conditions
enough to extinguish life, as it then existed. If the fate of the dinosaurs
interests you, pay attention---you may be seeing a replay in the Illinois
Republican Party.
Life forms become extinct when they
are no longer able to dominate other species for food and habitat.
Regardless of how you believe life began, the vast diversity of plants and
animals is how nature manifests new ideas and, depending in their ability to
adapt to the environment in which they find themselves, species succeed or
fail. Some are very good ideas, alligators, insects and humans, for example,
and others, like the dodo bird, are eventually outclassed by competitors.
Dinosaurs fascinate us because it is
hard to understand how a creature so dominating could loose in the natural
selection process. My theory is that some earth-shattering event was only
partly responsible; the problem and did not end the dinosaur’s domination
in just one day or year. Instead, they failed gradually in human terms but
quickly in evolutionary terms.
The situation in Illinois is analogous
but unlike dinosaurs, Illinois Republicans can overcome catastrophic events
if they adapt to a new environment.
The catastrophe is the revealed
corruption that has plagued the party. It is the signal event that changed
the political scene as significantly as a meteor or alien invasion might
have changed the dinosaur’s environment.
In its most dramatic form, corruption
means felonious behavior, lurid headlines and film crew stake-outs at the
Dirksen Building.
These courthouse stories, like those
prehistoric disasters, make it impossible for the traditional party to
survive in its recent form because it drives away thoughtful independents.
To their credit, however, Republicans nominated and installed a US Attorney
who indicts Republicans and Democrats equally.
Rooting out those embarrassing
officials is cathartic and will eventually benefit Illinois Republicans but
real criminality is sort of like the three-eyed snake or the chicken with
two heads. It is rare in nature and aberrant in Republican politics.
Much more dangerous than cops and
robber sleaze is the conceit that crowds out the party’s ideals.
Voters who used to support Republicans
of all temperaments have retired--or switched sides--because the party does
not appear to stand for much. Permanent incumbency at the expense of
leadership is the bacterium that has brought the great beast down. It has
infected the party and last November’s results manifest much-diminished
vital signs.
Nature’s typical response when one
species is having difficulty is to create a new species that exploits the
situation. While the traditional party is gasping, new political life forms
beginning to materialize and experience mitosis.
Often unsupported or unable to find a
place in the traditional party, these groups exhibit a great variety of
defining characteristics. They range from hard-working, action-oriented
folks with few resources to new Republican ward organizations in darkest
Chicago to sophisticated executives and seasoned activists meeting in the
city’s most exclusive clubs.
Visiting these neo-Republicans reveals
a vitality based on principle and an astonishing, unselfish desire to
improve life for the body politic. These are people that seem to be
uninterested in the practical exercise of power; rather, they seem more
interested in restricting the powers of government.
Battles between species usually lead
to winners and losers but let’s consider a third way. The traditional
Republican Party’s scale allows it to undertake the tasks that only
well-organized, statewide organizations are capable. What the party lacks,
however, are credible, well-developed, top-of- the- mind positions voters
can identify and identify with.
On the other hand, the new
organizations are small but lively. Experience shows that they are unlikely
to mount successful challenges to the status quo regardless of the energy
level they exhibit. Nevertheless, they have some very attractive ideas and
new ways to regard the problems our state faces.
Rather than see these nascent,
conservative organizations as an irrelevant, bacterial life forms as they
have in the past, traditional Republicans should inoculate the party with
the best of their ideas. An injection of fresh thought could be the
penicillin the wounded party needs to avoid functional extinction in an
increasingly hostile, Democrat environment.
Traditional Republicans who believe
neo-Republicans’ policies too conservative and their practices too extreme
should reacquaint themselves with the party’s situation and take this
prescription seriously.
Remember some dinosaurs became extinct
but others morphed into eagles.
And, one more bit of ancient history:
the last too-conservative and too-extreme paleo-conservative traditional
Republicans endorsed nationally was Ronald Reagan. Illinois should be so
lucky.
© 2005 IllinoisLeader.com -- all
rights reserved
Ralf Seiffe advises
business start-ups and product launches from Chicago, Illinois and is a
political analyst and columnist for the Illinois Leader.
|