 |
| Ralf
Seiffe argues that Ron
Gidwitz, GOP candidate for Governor, is the right messenger in the wrong
race. He should run for Mayor of Chicago in 2007 rather than Governor in
2006, so says Seiffe. |
SEIFFE: Switching Channels
Thursday, July 28, 2005
By Ralf Seiffe
OPINION - This past week, IllinoisLeader.com
reported that Ron Gidwitz has begun to run advertisements to support his
primary run for governor.
One of these cleared on the Fox News
Channel this morning which shows Mr. Gidwitz’s consumer marketing talents
are as sharp as ever.
The version I saw reminds the audience
of several specific campaign promises Rod Blagojevich made but has honored
exclusively in their breach.
The spots make the case that Gidwitz
is a successful business man who will change the corrupt culture Blagojevich
has magnified in Springfield.
As much as I agree with his message, I
think Mr. Gidwitz is seeking the wrong job.
The former chief executive of
Alberto-Culver is a take charge sort who would make a much better mayor of
Chicago than governor.
The city is a place where a forceful
personality--the Type A CEO with a vision--can be successful and is honored.
I’ve only met the candidate once but
I was impressed.
He appeared at the city’s 44th Ward
meeting a couple of months back, before he announced his candidacy. Jim
Fuchs, the ward committeeman, has done a remarkable job rounding up
prospective candidates and Gidwitz was one of the early respondents.
Despite the racket regular Monday
night patrons at the Big City Tap make, I found Gidwitz articulate and
well-informed about the state in which Illinois finds itself.
The now-announced candidate was
commodious with his time, sticking around to speak privately after his “scheduled”
time had expired.
Even more heartening, he wasn’t
flapped by the bar’s rowdy patrons and I believe that shows real tolerance
most pols claim but seldom demonstrate.
Even as refreshing as Candidate
Gidwitz appeared, I cannot help but think he’s better suited to win a
mayor’s race.
First, the governor’s race is loaded
with Republican reformers and every one of those hopefuls is capable of
running ads similar to the one for which Gidwitz is paying.
In varying degrees of credibility,
each of the visible candidates can lay claim as a reformer and, in
comparison to Blagojevich, even Boss Tweed would look good.
Chicago’s a different story.
No credible reformers are on the
horizon and the need for a un-public servant is becoming ever more evident
each time the U.S. attorney invites reporters to the Dirksen courthouse
building.
If the pace of indictments
continues--and the guilty pleas pile up--the mayor may be thinking of a new
career. By the time of the municipal election, the mayor may be so wounded
that there could be a realistic chance that many voters will want him
replaced.
As a contrarian, Mayor Daley’s
recent canonization by one of the weekly newsmagazines tells fate has some
difficulties in store for the mayor.
Businessman Gidwitz knows that
organizations become vulnerable to change in control when they fail to plan
for orderly succession. This certainly describes a city governed by the “Mayor
for Life” just as it did in 1976 when Richard I died in office.
That doesn’t mean the city goes
Republican.
A functionally open seat will draw
pretenders who want to become the big boss by leveraging the political
assets they now manage for the machine. Where these operatives once offered
their unquestionable support to the mayor, they may turn internecine when
there’s no real boss. Others may show up too; Jesse Jr. is a natural
regardless of his denials.
A real reformer might take advantage
of the vacuum just as Harold Washington did when his opposition split into
political camps.
Now, a generation later, Gidwitz could
do the same thing and serve the same purpose.
Nevertheless, most folks think there
is no chance for a Republican to become Chicago’s chief.
After all, there hasn’t been a
Republican mayor since about the time booze was illegal and the stockyards
were still operating. But remember the conventionally-wise once said the
same thing about New York City, yet, behold, the Big Apple has elected
Republicans in the last three contests.
New York’s current mayor might
provide Gidwitz guidance on how to overcome Chicago’s historic reality.
Michael Bloomberg was a Democrat who turned Republican to seek and win Rudy
Guiliani’s chair. He’s still a nominal Republican but most observers see
through the veneer.
Analogously, Gidwitz could re-invent
himself as a Democrat and go after Richard II’s seat.
By becoming a member of the city’s
ruling party he could overcome the genetic predisposition of city voters to
be Democrats and win a split primary. He might even run in both primaries!
Since this is Illinois, Candidate
Gidwitz should extract the promise of all other Republican gubernatorial
candidates that they will support him, regardless of his political
affiliation during the state-wide races and when the city race occurs in
2007.
Assuming Republicans nominate a
serious candidate for governor, this two-office strategy fits the reality of
Illinois’ political landscape.
Connecting the need for change in the
two most important offices provides the opportunity to craft a unified
message for voters.
Beyond that, the two-office strategy
with Gidwitz for mayor matches personalities and philosophies with the
offices’ constituencies.
This suggestion may seem a little too
tongue-in-cheek but Republican strategies to win Chicago have failed for a
lifetime.
Ron Gidwitz should simply switch his
commercial’s picture-in-picture from Hot Rod to Richie Daley and he’d
have a campaign that just sings.
© 2005 IllinoisLeader.com -- all
rights reserved
Ralf Seiffe advises
business start-ups and product launches from Chicago, Illinois and is a
political analyst and columnist for the Illinois Leader.
|