RALF SEIFFE |
Chicago Columnist Illinois Leader Political Analyst Entrepreneur Business Advisor Chicago Illinois Review |
|
|
|
SEIFFE: The Mayor's Good IdeaSunday , February 12, 2006 By Ralf Seiffe Mayor Daley’s
recent decision to effectively sell the Skyway provides an example of how
the state might fill the financial hole that several governors and the
General Assembly have dug. Illinois
needs to sell the Tollway. News that the mayor
had cooked up a deal to lease the Skyway for 99 years generated two
reactions. The first is an “at-a-boy”
because at one time “Skyway Bonds” was interchangeable with the term “municipal
default”. The fact that he was
able to find a buyer and sell it with a guarantee that tolls would rise only
moderately and then be frozen for several years is a real accomplishment. Usually,
transactions of this sort would generate all sorts of questions about which
of the mayor’s buddies made out. The
size of the deal -- $1.8 billion -- means there was enough for everybody.
But, the sale’s very magnitude also brings up a second, more fundamental
question: why was the mayor able to find a buyer at all? Governments should
take on projects only when there is no private sector entity willing or able
to undertake them. Governments
are able to tackle large projects because they enjoy extraordinary
privileges, like taxing power and eminent domain, to build roads, dams or
even stadia. In return, the
public expects that government will do the least possible damage to the
lives and economy of its citizens. This
means condemning the fewest number of homes and to set prices at revenue
producing projects that just recovers costs but that does not make a “profit”. Theoretically, the
tolls the Skyway collects should equal the cost of employing the
toll-takers, the cost of maintaining the property and paying the interest
and principle on whatever bonds may still be outstanding.
Simplistically, there should be no Skyway “profits” nor should
there be an expectation that there will be.
Accordingly, there should be no market value for the property. Despite this, an
investment group was willing to plunk down serious money -- even in Euros --
for the right to operate the Skyway. The
investors would only risk their capital if their risk-adjusted forecast
showed a positive return. At first, I was
skeptical about the motivation to sell the Skyway but upon querying members
of the financial press, it appears to be a brilliant transaction.
That’s because the price was 40 times revenues. To put this into
perspective, the same valuation applied to an exquisitely profitable
software company earning a juicy 25% after-tax profit margin on sales would
result in a stratospheric P/E Ration of 160.
That’s 2.2 times better than the market’s valuation of Google.
What’s fascinating
is that this is not a risk-free deal for the investors.
The Skyway has alternatives -- economists would call them substitutes
-- that will get you to The investors must
believe there’s a big enough profit to be made even without a big toll
increase. If they can’t
meaningfully raise prices in the short-term, they must believe they can
reduce costs to make a profit. So,
here’s an example where private sector efficiencies applied to a public
sector projects results in the elusive win-win result. Applying the Skyway’s
valuation to the Tollway means If the proceeds
could be kept safe from the irresponsible spenders in ©
2006 Ralf Seiffe Ralf Seiffe advises business start-ups and product launches from Chicago, Illinois and is a political analyst and columnist for the Illinois Leader and Illinois Review.
|