RALF SEIFFE

Chicago Columnist Illinois Review · Political Strategist Analyst · Expert Advisor Institute for Truth in Accounting

 

Our Official National Debt

More at Institute for Truth In Accounting

 

 

Home Page

 

Read Seiffe's Columns From The Illinois Leader and Illinois Review

 

December 2009

In Hopenhagen

 

November 2009

What Hit Us Last Night?

 

May 2009

Ninja Governor, Subprime State

 

April 2009

Tea Parties and Social Movements

 

March 2009

Outrage About AIG

 

February 2009

Who Are Durbin and Burris Representing?

 

January 2009

Rootin' For Rod

 

December 2008

New Year's Resolution

A Cynic Looks At The Blago Bust

 

November  2008

Obama's Personnel Problem

The Price For A Bail Out

The Next Bail Out

 

October  2008

Disqualifying Experience

The Real Story On Fannie Mae

Bruno V. Clout - Round II

 

September 2008

Why The Bail Out Bill Failed...And Why It Will Fail Again

Bruno vs. Clout

It's The Economy, Dumbbell!

The Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Meltdown

See The Speech?

 

August 2008

The Palin Choice

Barack Takes Over

Chicago Tells 

How I Met Joe Biden

IOUSA Premiere Reveals Nation's Deficits

Barackenstein 

 

Archives

Archive 2009

Archive 2008

Archive 2007

Archive 2006

Archive 2005

Archive 2004

 

Contact

Email:  ralf29@att.net

 Ralf Seiffe advises business start-ups and product launches from Chicago and is a political analyst and columnist for the Illinois Leader and Illinois Review.

SEIFFE:  Bruno V. Clout - Round II

Wednesday, October 1, 2008 

By Ralf Seiffe

Too bad our friend Bruno Behrend didn’t decide to be a full-time lawyer.  He’s now undefeated, in his two cases, winning this round in the election case we reported here last week.  Bruno is representing clients suing the Secretary of State over the language regarding the call for a Constitutional Convention that must be on the November ballot.  Bruno’s case asserts that the language should be struck because it is misleading and inaccurate.  The judge agreed and ordered the parties to come up with a remedy. 

Today’s hearing had representatives of the Secretary and others election officials in court to ask the judge to dismiss the case.  Worried that there is not enough time to remedy the ballot’s deficiencies, the Secretary’s lawyers asserted the doctrine of laches, which would squash the case based on delay in bringing suit.   This flimsy position evaporated when evidence showed that the offending language was added long after election commissioners certified the Con Con referendum. Indeed, it appears that Bruno’s suit was filed less than a week after the bad language first was displayed on the Internet. 

The day after Behrend filed suit, the Chicago Bar Association also filed with an expanded case.  Lt. Governor Pat Quinn intervened with his own supporting objections and he was in court this afternoon, arguing his own points, effectively.  Of the eight Bar Association counts, the judge dismissed five and let three stand.

Compliments to Bruno; of the dozen or so lawyers in the room, his presentation was on target, brief, cogent, and convincing.  His characterization that the ballot was tainted and if it were a consumer product, the Illinois AG Lisa Madigan would be on TV getting it recalled.  That must have hit the mark; the clout objected to that characterization, the only time all day.

Ralf Seiffe advises business start-ups and product launches from Chicago, Illinois and is a political analyst and columnist for the Illinois Leader and Illinois Review.

Webmaster Contact:  Alynn Patzer alynn11111@aol.com